![]() Now that some users have the freedom to stay in one place for their entire workflow, it will only be a matter of time until all users demand the freedom to stay in one place with an all-in-one tool. The need and desire to jump between programs to create content vanished almost over night, and Resolve’s all-in-one approach served as foreshadowing - this is what the future of video editing looks like. This approach felt practically luxurious. When Blackmagic coupled those capabilities with traditional video editing, they created an ideal one-stop shop that immediately caught the attention of users. Resolve already had astounding coloring capabilities. When DaVinci Resolve 16 hit the market, people began to see that perhaps one program can do it all. At a minimum you’re likely firing up Resolve and After Effects before things are wrapped up. If you’re working in Premiere, then nailing your desired final look requires a degree of program hopping. But $20.99 a month over the span of a career is, especially for an issue-prone software that quickly ends up being more expensive than its more efficient competitors. Avid Media Composer currently comes in at $1,279 total, but at least you own it. You can get Resolve or FCPX for a one-time payment of $299. Because there’s no end in sight.At Premiere’s current cost of $20.99/mo, a year costs around $250. And now, after years as a subscriber, the appeal of Premiere Pro as my primary creative tool just ain’t what it used to be. You can almost hear the marketing copy: “Less than $25 a month! Sign up to start saving today!” You pay a relatively small monthly fee instead of a larger upfront price like what’s associated with the disc-based Adobe Master collection. When the subscription-based Creative Cloud was released in 2013, it seemed like a great deal and a solid concept. I just don’t like renting a tool that I use nearly every day. I’m pretty over subscription models for software. Unlike most major NLEs, Premiere Pro requires a subscription. But mostly you’ll find plenty of videographers discovering they aren’t alone in their frustration with Premiere’s performance. If you require additional social proof, simply skim the comments attached to the tests. With little effort, you can find videos and articles that prove it in detailed side-by-side experiments that compare workflow and export speed differences between programs. Because out of the major NLEs - Premiere Pro, Final Cut Pro X, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid Media Composer - Premiere is the slowest. Had I just become too biased? Was it all in my head? Toward the end of my time with Premiere, it seemed like the program got slower with each new release. If you can relate to any of the following frustrations, just remember - there’s no time like the present, and another bug or performance-slowing update could appear at any time. Let’s look at a few of the reasons I can’t shake the feeling that Premiere is falling behind when compared to the many other video editing applications currently available to content creators. As such, I finally made the leap to FCPX, and I’m happy I did. Even though I fully understood that, in this fast-moving industry, resistance to change can hinder progress and success. Why am I still putting up with this when there are plenty more NLEs in the sea?Īs many times as I considered leaving Premiere Pro for another NLE, I resisted for a long time. We will attempt to save your current project.” Sigh.Īs I sifted through seemingly countless folders of Premiere auto-saves and project recovery files, I had an epiphany: I don’t have to put up with this. I mumbled this to myself as I stared forlornly at the all-too-familiar words on the screen in front of me: “Sorry, a serious error has occurred that requires Adobe Premiere Pro to shut down. ![]() Are Premiere Pro’s best days behind it? If you said “yes,” then why are you still using it? Here are a few reasons I’ve moved on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |